case law air 1964 ker 277 - An Overview
case law air 1964 ker 277 - An Overview
Blog Article
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of your information contained on this site, or even the information linked to about the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can create inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
Article 199 from the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other adequate remedy is provided by legislation." It really is nicely-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust offered remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Individuals remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
However, decisions rendered by the Supreme Court on the United States are binding on all federal courts, and on state courts regarding issues on the Constitution and federal legislation.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy from the information contained on this site, or the information linked to to the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
13 . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some duration, both parties have agreed on the disposal of the instant petition to the premise that the DIGP Malir will hear the petitioner and private respondents and will just take care of all of the components of the case and make certain that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
Generally speaking, higher courts usually do not have direct oversight over the reduce courts of record, in that they cannot reach out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments with the reduced courts.
Summaries offer a concise insight into the realm of dispute resolution exterior traditional court proceedings. In Pakistan, arbitration serves as a vital alternative for resolving commercial conflicts quickly and successfully.
168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Matter: Appeal At times it's convenient for a Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to help make an attempt to get rid of a case on benefit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it has arrived at into a stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for advantage disposal when it's reached such stage. Read more
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to your main case, it is also a effectively-recognized proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is topic towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.
This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the summary or finding reached by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the summary or finding is which include no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court could interfere with the conclusion or even the finding and mildew the relief to really make it ideal to your facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is definitely the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-respect the evidence or the nature of punishment. About the aforesaid proposition, we've been fortified because of the decision on the Supreme Court in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
The police have the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a Court for cognizable offenses. The existence of this power casts an obligation over the police, and they must bear in mind, as held by this Court from time to time in its several pronouncemnts, that if a person is arrested to get a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Primarily, the Police Officers are needed to protect instead of abduct. Read more
Summaries of cases that condition the lives of youthful individuals, ensuring a further understanding of justice within the juvenile system. Knowledge that matters, crafted for legal professionals and fanatics alike.
As the Supreme Court is definitely the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has actually been reached, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs for being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) on the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
The uncovered Tribunal shall decide the case on merits, without being influenced via the findings while in the Impugned order, after recording of click here evidence on the respective parties. Read more